LINGUALIZED OCCLUSION -AN OPTIMAL OCCLUSAL SCHEME IN SEVERE RESIDUAL RIDGE RESORPTION IN EDENTULOUS PATIENTS
Abstract
Occlusion has a considerable influence on the outcome of every Prosthodontic treatment as occlusal prematurities have destructive and destabilizing influences on dentures. Unless denture bases are adequately and evenly stabilized, it is virtually impossible to properly equilibrate the occlusion. In order to overcome this problem the relative simplicity involved in the development, the lingualized occlusal scheme has gained favor among practitioners as adjustment required to compensate for minor changes in vertical and centric relation are readily accomplished for dentures. Thus, this article describes the principles and practical implementation of an arrangement in lingualized occlusion, as an optimal occlusal scheme in severe residual ridge resorption of edentulous patients
Downloads
References
2. Boucher CO, Hickey JC, Zarb GA.Prosthodontic Treatment for Edentulous Patients, ed 10.St Louis.CV Mosby, 1990.
3. Harold R Ortman, Complete Denture Occlusion In Sheldon Winkler. Essentials of Complete Denture Prosthodontics.2ed.India:A.I.T.B.S.Publishers 2009: 217-249.
4. Bernard Levin: A Review Of Artificial Posterior Tooth Forms Including A Preliminary Report On A New Posterior Tooth. J Prosthet Dent 1977; 38:3-15.
5. DeVan, M.M. Concept of Neutro-centric occlusion. JADA 48:165-169, 1954. De Van, M M: Synopsis, Stability In Full Denture Construction, Penn, Dent.J.22:8,1955
6. The glossary of prosthodontic terms. J Prosthet Dent.2005; 94:49–81.
7. Winter CM. Woelfel JB, Igarashi T. Five Year Changes in the Edentulous Mandible as Determined on Oblique Cephalometric Radiographs. J Dent Res. 53: 1455-1467, 1974.
8. Boswell JV. Practical Occlusion in Relation to Complete Dentures, J Prosthet Dent.1: 307-321, 1951.
9. Sears VH. Specifications for Artificial Posterior Teeth, J Prosthet Dent. 2: 353-361, 1952.
10. Porter CG. The Cuspless Centralized Occlusal Pattern, J Prosthet Dent. 5: 313-318, 1955.
11. Seras VH: Principles And Technique Of Complete Denture Construction.St Louis, CV Mosby,1949.
12. Samuel Friedman. A Comparative Analysis Of Conflicting Factors in the Selection Of The Occlusal Pattern For Edentulous Patients, J Prosth. Dent 1964; 14:31-44.
13. Robert Rapp. The Occlusion And Occlusal Patterns Of Artificial Posterior Teeth, J Prosth. Dent 1954; 4:461-480.
14. Chastain G Porter. The Cuspless Centralized Occlusal Pattern, J Prosth Dent 1955;5:313-318.
15. Levin, B. Monoplane Teeth. J Am Dent Asso. 1972; 85: 781-783.
16. Myerson RL. The Use of Porcelain and Plastic Teeth in Opposing Complete Dentures, J. Prosthet. Dent. 1957;7 625-633.
17. Koran A, Craig RG, Tillitson EW. Coefficient of Friction of Prosthetic Tooth Materials, J. Prosthet. Dent.1972; 27: 269-274.
18. Donald GG, Charles JS. Lineal Occlusion Concepts For Complete Dentures, J Prosth Dent.1974;32:122-129.
19. Hardy IR, Passamonti GA. Method of arranging artificial teeth for class II jaw relations. J. Prosthet Dent 13:606-610, 1963.
20. .Goyal BK, Bhargava K: Arrangement of artificial teeth in abnormal jaw relations: maxillary protrusion and wider upper arch. J Prosthet Dent.1974; 32:107.
21. Goyal BK, Bhargava K: Arrangement of artificial teeth in abnormal jaw relations: mandibular protrusion and wider lower arch. J Prosthet Dent.1974; 32:458.
22. AF Sutton, JF McCord: A randomized clinical trial comparing anatomic, lingualized, and zero-degree posterior occlusal forms for complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent 2007; 97:292-298.
23. Clough HE, Knodle JM, Leeper SH, Pudwill ML, Taylor DT.A comparison of lingualized occlusion and monoplane occlusion in complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 1983; 50:176-179.
24. Judson C. Hickey, James A. Kreider, Carl O. Boucher, Otto Storz: A method of studying the influence of occlusal schemes on muscular activity. J Prosthet Dent. 1959;9:498-505
25. Michael Frederico Manzolli Basso, a Sergio Sualdini Nogueira, Joao Neudenir Arioli-Filho: Comparison of the occlusal vertical dimension after processing complete dentures made with lingualized balanced occlusion and conventional balanced occlusion J Prosthet Dent 2006; 96:200-4.
26. Ohguri T, Ichikawa T, Matsumoto N. Influence of occlusal scheme on the pressure distribution under a complete denture. Int J Prosthodont.1999 Jul-Aug; 12(4):353-8.
27. Mansuang Arksornnukit, Thitima Phunthikaphadr, and HidekazuTakahashi: Pressure transmission and distribution under denture bases using denture teeth with different materials and cuspal angulations.J Prosthet Dent 2011;105:127-13.
28. Matsumaru Y. Influence of mandibular residual ridge resorption on objective masticatory measures of lingualized and fully bilateral balanced denture articulation. J Prosthodont Res. 2010 Jul; 54(3):112-8.
29. Kimoto S, Gunji A, Yamakawa A, Ajiro H, Kanno K, Shinomiya M, Kawai Y, Kawara M, Kobayashi K. Prospective clinical trial comparing lingualized occlusion to bilateral balanced occlusion in complete dentures: a pilot study. Int J Prosthodont. 2006 Jan-Feb; 19(1):103-9.
30. Heidecker G, Akkad AS, Wolkewitz M, Vogeler M, Strub JR.Patient ratings of chewing ability from a randomized crossover trial: legalized vs. first premolar/canine-guided occlusion for complete dentures. Gerodontology. 2007 Jun; 24(2):77-86.
31. William S Jameson: The Use Of Linear Occlusion To Treat A Patient With Combination Syndrome: A Case Report.J Prosth Dent 2001;85:15-19.