OUTCOMES OF DIRECT PULP CAPPING DONE BY DEFERENT MATERIALS IN PERMANENT TEETH: AFTER 1 YEAR RECALL

  • Dr. Saad Ali Sabrah Armed Forces Hospital South Region, Senior house officer, Department of dentistry Khamis Mushyt, Saudi Arabia
  • Dr. Mohammed Thamer Alqahtan Armed Forces Hospital South Region, Senior house officer, Department of dentistry Khamis Mushyt, Saudi Arabia
Keywords: Biodentine, Direct pulp capping, mineral trioxide aggregate

Abstract

Aim: This study is aimed to compare the prognosis between deferent direct pulp capping materials (CH, MTA, and Biodentine) in permanent teeth of Saudi population after the 1-year recall.

Methods: Randomized patient samples were collected in armed forces hospital – dental department included 72 patients between 18 and 40 years old. They were divided into 3 groups according to the materials of direct pulp capping (CH 24patients), (Biodentine 24 patients), or (mineral trioxide aggregate [MTA] 24 patients). After one year recall, the patients were diagnosed clinically and radiographically using the Fisher exact test.

Results: No clear deference were detected between CH, MTA, and biodentine in terms of failure of the total of 72 teeth, only 2 recorded failures, 1 of each group(CH, MTA) except dentine.

CH : 1:24

MTA : 1:24

Biodentine : 0:24

Biodentine has no inflammatory pulpal response compared to CH and MTA .

Conclusion: This study shows no significant difference between the deferent types of direct pulp capping materials. biodentine shows better properties in direct pulp capping compared to CH and MTA and has no failure cases recorded.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1-Camp JH, Fuks AB. (2006). Pediatrics: endodontic treatment for the primary and young permanent dentition. In: Pathways to the pulp. 9th ed Cohen S, Hargreaves KM, editors. , editors. St. Louis, MO: Mosby Elsevier, pp. 822-882.
2-Hilton TJ. (2009). Keys to clinical success with pulp capping: a review of the literature. Oper Dent 34:615-625.
3-Mente J, Geletneky B, Ohle M, Koch MJ, Friedrich Ding PG, Wolff D, Dreyhaupt J, Martin N, Staehle HJ, Pfefferle T J Endod. 2010 May; 36(5):806-13.
4-Baume LJ, Holz J. (1981). Long-term clinical assessment of direct pulp capping. Int Dent J 31:251-260.
5-Barthel CR, Levin LG, Reisner HM, Trope M Int Endod J. 1997 May; 30(3):155-9.
6-Graham L, Cooper PR, Cassidy N, Nor JE, Sloan AJ, Smith A J Biomaterials. 2006 May; 27(14):2865-73.
7-Zhang W, Walboomers XF, Jansen JA J Biomed Mater Res A. 2008 May; 85(2):439-44.
8-Camilleri J Int Endod J. 2008 May; 41(5):408-17.
9-Aeinehchi M, Eslami B, Ghanbariha M, Saffar AS Int Endod J. 2003 Mar; 36(3):225-31.
10-Chacko V, Kurikose S J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2006 Spring; 30(3):203-9
11-Min KS, Park HJ, Lee SK, Park SH, Hong CU, Kim HW, Lee HH, Kim EC J Endod. 2008 Jun; 34(6):666-70.
12-Nair PN, Duncan HF, Pitt Ford TR, Luder HU Int Endod J. 2008 Feb; 41(2):128-50.
13-Septodont Biodentine™ Active Biosilicate Technology™ Scientific file 2010.
How to Cite
1.
Dr. Saad Ali Sabrah, Dr. Mohammed Thamer Alqahtan. OUTCOMES OF DIRECT PULP CAPPING DONE BY DEFERENT MATERIALS IN PERMANENT TEETH: AFTER 1 YEAR RECALL. Med. res. chronicles [Internet]. 2017Dec.31 [cited 2024May3];4(06):591-2. Available from: https://medrech.com/index.php/medrech/article/view/280
Section
Original Research Article