PALMAR AND DIGITAL DERMATOGLYPHIC PATTERNS IN INFERTILE MALES IN THE POPULATION OF BIHAR

  • Bheem Prasad Assistant Professor, Department of Anatomy, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Phulwari Sharif, Patna, Bihar, India
  • Sarita Kumari Senior Resident, Department of Anatomy, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Phulwari Sharif, Patna, Bihar, India
  • Padamjeet Panchal Assistant Professor, Department of Anatomy, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Phulwari Sharif, Patna, Bihar, India
  • Dayanidhi Kumar Laboratory Director, Indira IVF, Raja Bazaar, Patna, Bihar, India
Keywords: Dermatoglyphic, male infertility, fingerprint patterns, finger ridge count, palmer prints

Abstract

Background: Dermatoglyphics is a science which can help to predict occurrence of a specific disease. Dermatoglyphics may be useful to find out suspected infertile male patients from a large population which can further be subjected to more investigations. Different diseases have different dermatoglyphic patterns associated with them. Some diseases showing association with Dermatoglyphics include Sickle cell anaemia, congenital heart disease, Rheumatoid Arthritis, Diabetes mellitus, Down’s syndrome and Cancers such as Breast and Prostate.

Objective: The purpose of this study is to compare the frequencies of different fingerprint patterns of infertile males with normal populations.

Materials and Methods: This study was conducted on 108 infertile male patients with abnormal semen profile and compared with an equal number of age matched fertile males. We studied fingerprint patterns in all subjects.

Result: Loop was the commonest pattern followed by Whorls and Arch in both groups. There is a significant difference between the numbers of arches in infertile cases and controls. We also found the statistically significant difference between patterns of finger ridge count in thumb and ring finger (left hand) of infertile males and controls. The mean of atd angle, dat angle and adt angle on the left hand of infertile males were statistically significant from those of the controls. Whereas the mean of all these angles is not being statistically significant in right hand of both cases as well as controls.

Conclusion: Dermatoglyphics may be used for infertility screening of a large population because it is simple, non-invasive and inexpensive technique. It may be also used as a supportive investigatory tool for clinicians.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Ramesh M, Kumari KG, Kalpana VL, Sudhakar G. Palmar and digital dermatoglyphic patterns in sickle cell anaemia patients of north coastal Andhra Pradesh, South India. Physical Anthropol 2012; 8: 23-32.
2. Alter M, Schulenberg R. Dermatoglyphics in congenital heart disease. Circulation 1970: 49-54.
3. Hwang SB, Chung MS, Park JS, Suh CH. Dermatoglyphic Characteristics of Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis. Korean J Phys Anthropol 2005; 18: 1-9.
4. Rajanigandha V, Pai M, Prabhu L, Saralaya V. Digito-Palmar Complex in Non-Insulin Dependent Diabetes Mellitus. Turk J Med Sci 2006; 36: 353- 5.
5. Boroffice IA. Down’s syndrome in Nigeria: dermatoglyphic analysis of 50 cases. Nigerian Med J 1978; 8: 571-6.
6. Sridevi NS, Wilma Delphine Silvia CR, Kulkarni R, Seshagiri C. Palmar Dermatoglyphics in carcinoma breast of Indian women. Romanian J Morphol Embryol 2010; 51: 547-50.
7. Singh B, Jafar S. Study of Fingerprint Patterns in Oligospermic Male. Journal of Medical Science and Clinical Research 2017; 05(11): 30480-83
8. Sontakke BR, Talhar S, Ingole IV, Shende MR, Pal AK, Bhattacharaya T. Dermatoglyphic pattern in male infertility. Nepal Med Coll J 2012; 15(2): 106-109
9. Jafari HP, Chaleshtori MH, Farhud DD. Dermatoglyphics in Patients with Oligo / Azospermia. Iranian J Publ Health 2005; 34: 56-61.
10. Heralaut Y, Fradeau N, Zakany J. Ulnaless (UI), a regulatory mutation inducing both loss-of—function of posterior Hoxd genes. Development. 1997; 124, 3493-3500.
11. Peichel C, Prabhakaran B, Vogt T. The mouse ulnaless mutation deregulates posterior Hox D gene expression and alters appendicular parterning. Development. 1997; 124: 3481-3492.
12. Cummins H and Midlo C. History. In: Finger Prints, Palms and Soles- An Introduction to Dermatoglyphics. New York: Dovar, 1943: 4-37.
13. Whitelaw WA. The Proceedings of the 11th Annual History of Medicine Days, http://www.hom.ucalgary.ca/dayspapers2002.pdf, 2002.
14. Oladipo GS, Sapira MK, Ekeke ON et al. Dermatoglyphics of prostate cancer patients. Current Res J Biol Sci 2009; 1: 131-4.
15. Makol N, Kshatriya G, Basu S. Study of finger and palmar dermatoglyphics in primary infertile males. Anthropol Anz 1994; 52: 59-65
16. Salem EA, Hafiez AR, El Kerdasi Z et al. Genetic studies in varicocele infertility: Dermatoglyphic pattern. Andrologia1984; 16: 102-10.
How to Cite
1.
Bheem Prasad, Sarita Kumari, Padamjeet Panchal, Dayanidhi Kumar. PALMAR AND DIGITAL DERMATOGLYPHIC PATTERNS IN INFERTILE MALES IN THE POPULATION OF BIHAR. Med. res. chronicles [Internet]. 2018Oct.31 [cited 2024Apr.25];5(5):323-9. Available from: https://medrech.com/index.php/medrech/article/view/320
Section
Original Research Article