CLINICAL VARIABLES ASSOCIATED WITH THE REHABILITATION OF A HEMIMANDIBULECTOMY PATIENT

  • Manas Singh Department of Prosthodontics, Subharti dental college, Subharti University, Meerut, India
  • Khurshid Mattoo Department of Prosthodontics, College of dentistry, Jazan University, (KSA)
  • Lakshya Yadav Department of Prosthodontics, King George dental college, KGM University, Lucknow, India
Keywords: mandibular movements, occlusion, articulator, sarcoma, translation, articular disc

Abstract

The mandible is perhaps one of rarest bones that could be hypothetically termed as an organ because not only it helps in mastication and deglutition it plays a major role in species survival. Humans exceptionally have refined and mastered its use in communication also. The bone is unique in the body since it is a single bone that is attached by two separate joints that are capable of functioning independently. Its attachment with the remaining skull besides temperomandibular joint also includes an attachment through muscles, ligaments, disk, occlusion, and skin. Any breach in the continuity of the mandible through disease or trauma results in a pattern of mandibular movement that is more complex and dynamic in nature. Hemimandibulectomy is one such clinical condition that results after the removal of any portion of the mandible and poses clinical challenges to prosthodontic rehabilitationists. This article presents a case of hemimandibulectomy who was successfully rehabilitated by using a dynamic occlusal ramp in the maxillary complete denture.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Beumer. J III, Curtis T.A, Marunick MT. Maxillofacial Rehabilitation. Prosthodontic and surgical consideration. St. Louis: Ishiyaku. Euro America. 1996. p. 113 –224.
[2] Taylor TD. Clinical maxillofacial prosthetics. Quintessence Publishing Co, Illinois, 1997. p. 171-188.
[3] Beumer J III, Curtis TA, Marunick MT (1996) Maxillofacial rehabilitation: prosthodontic and surgical consideration. Ishiyaku Euro America, St. Louis, pp 184–188.
[4] Shetty P, Baliga M, Rodrigues S, Dixit S. Prosthetic management following mandibular resection: a clinical report. J Nepal Dent Assoc. 2009; 10(1):57–60.
[5] Cantor R, Curtis TA. Prosthetic management of edentulous mandibulectomy patients. Part 1 Anatomic, physiologic and psychological considerations. J Prosthet Dent. 1971; 25:446-57.
[6] Schneider RL, Taylor TD. Mandibular resection guidance prostheses: A literature review. J Prosthet Dent 1986:55:84–86.
[7] Robinson JE, Rubright W.C. Use of a guide plane for maintaining the residual fragment in partial or hemimandibulectomy. J Prosthet Dent 1964; 14:992 -9.
[8] Moore DJ, Mitchell DL. Rehabilitating dentulous hemimandibulectomy patients. J Prosthet Dent 1976:35:202–6.
[9] Fattore L, Marchmont – Robinson H, Crinzi RA, Edmonds DC. Use of a two piece Gunning splint as a Mandibular guide appliance for a patient treated for Ameloblastoma. Oral Surgery, Oral Med Oral Patho. 1988; 66:662-5.
[10] Hasanreisoglu U, Uçtasli S, Gurbuz A. Mandibular guidance prosthesis following resection procedures: Three case reports. Eur J Prosthodont Rest Dent 1992; 1:69-72.
[11] Sahin N, Hekimoğlu C, Aslan Y. The fabrication of cast metal guidance flange prostheses for a patient with segmental mandibulectomy: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2005; 93:217-20.
[12] Prencipe MA, Durval E, De Salvador A, Tatini C, Branchi Roberto. Removable Partial Prosthesis (RPP) with acrylic resin flange for the mandibular guidance therapy. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2009;8:19–21.
[13] Charles CS (1969) Prosthetic management of resected edentulous mandibles. J Prosthet Dent 14:197–202.
[14] Sharry JJ. Extension of partial denture treatment. Dent Clin North Am 1962; 6: 821-35.
How to Cite
1.
Singh M, Mattoo K, Yadav L. CLINICAL VARIABLES ASSOCIATED WITH THE REHABILITATION OF A HEMIMANDIBULECTOMY PATIENT. Med. res. chronicles [Internet]. 2015Jan.11 [cited 2024May3];2(1):14-8. Available from: https://medrech.com/index.php/medrech/article/view/42
Section
Original Research Article