CAST PARTIAL DENTURE-A NON-MOTIVATED TREATMENT OPTION IN THE PRESENT ERA

  • Khurshid Mattoo Department of Prosthodontics, College of dentistry, Jazan University, (KSA)
  • Shujaurrahman Department of Prosthodontics, Subharti dental college, Subharti University, Meerut, (India)
  • Lakshya Yadav Department of Prosthodontics, King George dental college, KGM University, Lucknow, (India)
Keywords: partial edentulism, casting, patient education, motivation, dental implant

Abstract

Widespread demand for fixed Prosthodontics has seen a drastic reduction in the deliverance of cast partial denture as a treatment option in many partial edentulous situations. Although it is right for the patient to demand any treatment option it becomes the prime duty of the practitioner to deliver what is good for the patient in such a situation. Unfortunately, the option for cast partial denture as a treatment option is fast becoming obsolete presently due to many factors including financial. Motivating patients to choose such an option has to be backed up with adequate results. This article presents a case report of an adult female who wanted only a fixed prosthesis, but through education and motivation received a cast partial denture which was the only indicated prosthesis in her case.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Petropoulos VC, Rashedi B. Removable partial denture education in U.S. dental schools. J Prosthodont. 2006; 15:62-8.
2. Basker RM, Harrison A, Davenport JC, Marshall JL. Partial denture design in general dental practice--10 years on. Br Dent J.1988; 165:245-9.
3. Lynch CD, Allen PF. A survey of chrome-cobalt RPD design in Ireland. Int J Prosthodont. 2003; 16:362-4.
4. Lynch CD, Allen PF. Quality of written prescriptions and master impressions for fixed and removable prosthodontics: a comparative study. Br Dent J. 2005; 198:17-20.
5. Kilfeather GP, Lynch CD, Sloan AJ, Youngson CC. Quality of communication and master impressions for the fabrication of cobalt chromium removable partial dentures in general dental practice in England, Ireland and Wales in 2009. J Oral Rehabil. 2010; 37:300-5.
6. Schwarz WD, Barsby MJ. A survey of the practice of partial denture prosthetics in the United Kingdom. J Dent. 1980; 8:95-101.
7. Radhi A, Lynch CD, Hannigan A. Quality of written communication and master impressions for fabrication of removable partial prostheses in the Kingdom of Bahrain. J Oral Rehabil. 2007; 34:153-7.
8. Schwarz WD, Barsby MJ. Design of partial dentures in dental practice. J Dent. 1978; 6:166-70.
9. Owall B, Budtz-Jörgensen E, Davenport J, Mushimoto E, Palmqvist S, Renner R, et al. Removable partial denture design: a need to focus on hygienic principles? Int J Prosthodont. 2002; 15:371-8.
10. Lechner SK, Thomas GA, Bradshaw M. An interactive multimedia solution to learning removable partial denture design. J Prosthodont. 1998; 7:177-82.
11. Jepson NJ, Thomason JM, Steele JG. The influence of denture design on patient acceptance of partial dentures. Br Dent J. 1995; 178:296-300.
How to Cite
1.
Mattoo K, Shujaurrahman, Yadav L. CAST PARTIAL DENTURE-A NON-MOTIVATED TREATMENT OPTION IN THE PRESENT ERA. Med. res. chronicles [Internet]. 2015Mar.15 [cited 2024Dec.22];2(2):191-4. Available from: https://medrech.com/index.php/medrech/article/view/70
Section
Case Report